[OOC] General Discussion
- Thread starter Deroc
- Start date
Edge45
The Piemaster
Aye thanks guys, the second text is done.
(Seems I messed up some parts, but oh well.)
But we're still gonna set up some threads and then the IC before we'll start.
@CookiesMcSalsa
Nice, (Does it come with beer? :3)
Steampunk should be accessible at the current time setting of the coming roleplay, so yeah they might do.
Steampunk will not also be limited to oil, magic energies can be applied, (though it might be called magitech instead)
Btw, I'm rather interested in this Gilded Americas of yours. Cynicz vs Idealists was it? Would this actually have in common with the American Civil War?
(Seems I messed up some parts, but oh well.)
But we're still gonna set up some threads and then the IC before we'll start.
@CookiesMcSalsa
Nice, (Does it come with beer? :3)
Steampunk should be accessible at the current time setting of the coming roleplay, so yeah they might do.
Steampunk will not also be limited to oil, magic energies can be applied, (though it might be called magitech instead)
Btw, I'm rather interested in this Gilded Americas of yours. Cynicz vs Idealists was it? Would this actually have in common with the American Civil War?
Ragenaut
Don't get between me and my munchies
Yeah, the Cynics would've been Confederates, and the Idealists would be Unioners. Cool deal about the magic infused gadgets, but my main concern was there being Oilpunk. Wanted to keep to a theme of Old American Fantasy. They're probably gonna be giants, too. Twice the size of a human.
Deroc
Muggeseggele!
Ehh, yes, maybe.
But I think the general technology level is closer to the time when we see swords and muskets in action side-by-side, backed by old-fashioned cannons (from about 14th century to 19th century). Thoughts and Opinions?
Nice
Deroc
Muggeseggele!
About Square One's specific rules and guidelines proposed by @Edge45:
It's great overall, especially with the addition of guidelines that help clarify things up as well as some rules that make roleplaying easier, funner and more balanced.
However, I need to comment on some aspects of the rules he proposed,
Time Setting does not equal to Technology Level, keep that in mind.
In my opinion we should change the wording a little bit, let's change "Time Setting" into "Technology Level".
Initially I intend for Terra to be technologically hundreds of year ahead of Vestroya in the beginning. But we'll see what can we do to solve the time gap and technology gap between Terra and Vestroya,
(Otherwise it has a good chance to ruin my character Deroc and other things in my mind)
Good rule, which allows for more open possibilities and fun.
Well, again in my humble opinion, "equivalent history" should be changed into "equivalent technology level".
Conflicting and Confusing Rules
What...
I'm totally confused, Piemaster.
These two rules contradict and conflict with each other...
Also pardon me but what were you saying in the first rule regarding characters ("taking into point its advantages, weaknesses, and affiliations")? If we are to enforce the first rule, then the second rule I quotes will be void and we'll be restricted unnecessarily.
You know, for an army in this kind of RP, we also need to have other supporting and minor characters in our disposal.
It's great overall, especially with the addition of guidelines that help clarify things up as well as some rules that make roleplaying easier, funner and more balanced.
However, I need to comment on some aspects of the rules he proposed,
Time Setting does not equal to Technology Level, keep that in mind.
In my opinion we should change the wording a little bit, let's change "Time Setting" into "Technology Level".
Initially I intend for Terra to be technologically hundreds of year ahead of Vestroya in the beginning. But we'll see what can we do to solve the time gap and technology gap between Terra and Vestroya,
Good rule, which allows for more open possibilities and fun.
Well, again in my humble opinion, "equivalent history" should be changed into "equivalent technology level".
Conflicting and Confusing Rules
What...
I'm totally confused, Piemaster.
These two rules contradict and conflict with each other...
Also pardon me but what were you saying in the first rule regarding characters ("taking into point its advantages, weaknesses, and affiliations")? If we are to enforce the first rule, then the second rule I quotes will be void and we'll be restricted unnecessarily.
You know, for an army in this kind of RP, we also need to have other supporting and minor characters in our disposal.
Edge45
The Piemaster
I see, very well. I was actually describing the time setting equivalent to Earth/Terra. Though in otherwords, let's leave Terra out of this for now.
Whoops, got lost from words there.
The first quoted rule I actually meant;
- You don't necessarily need to make a faction to join in the roleplay. You can settle for one character, and can become fairly stronger, as well as you can let it join a particular faction of another if they allow you to.
Deroc
Muggeseggele!
Very well.
We'll talk about this sometimes later, but eventually we have to face this problem sooner or later.
I see.
Good enough.
No more I think, should be enough for now. Will ask later when problems emerge
Ragenaut
Don't get between me and my munchies
Alrighty then. I'll just turn my Civilization's clock back to the 1780-90s. Colonial America, post revolution.Ehh, yes, maybe.
But I think the general technology level is closer to the time when we see swords and muskets in action side-by-side, backed by old-fashioned cannons (from about 14th century to 19th century). Thoughts and Opinions?
Nice
Daffa the Mage
Active Member
Deroc
Muggeseggele!
@Daffa the Mage:
Hey, welcome back to the Campfire!
Really? Pardon but I didn't knew where is Nullmagic...
Anyways, will be updating the map later.
For notes regarding this map, see the [OOC] Mappings and Locations thread by @Edge45
Hey, welcome back to the Campfire!
Really? Pardon but I didn't knew where is Nullmagic...
Anyways, will be updating the map later.
For notes regarding this map, see the [OOC] Mappings and Locations thread by @Edge45
